<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>evince blog - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-9b9ccfbe" type="application/json"/><link>http://evince.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:07:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: National Aggregator - Functional Design</title><link>http://blog.evince-online.com/?p=73#comment-22119355</link><description>Nice Post I already digged this&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks&lt;br&gt;raven conway&lt;br&gt;______________________________________________</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Acuzio1231</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:07:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: evince Usability Forums - a Big Thank You!</title><link>http://blog.evince-online.com/?p=85#comment-21931916</link><description>Thanks for such a nice post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;regards&lt;br&gt;raven conway&lt;br&gt;______________________________________________</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aiken327489</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:13:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: evince Usability Forums - a Big Thank You!</title><link>http://blog.evince-online.com/?p=85#comment-21851370</link><description>where do i get more information on this&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have a nice day&lt;br&gt;james still&lt;br&gt;______________________________________________</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cristna34214</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:52:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GetSatisfaction support page now live!</title><link>http://blog.evince-online.com/?p=46#comment-8655877</link><description>hello&lt;br&gt;we are trying to tidy some lists up but are getting the message "This item could not be deleted.  This is likely to be because the item is currently in use, or the item is locked."&lt;br&gt;Is there a solution?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julie McDonald</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:26:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GetSatisfaction support page now live!</title><link>http://blog.evince-online.com/?p=46#comment-7634246</link><description>On the Course Unit -Booking form would it be possible to sort the people on the course by surname in the same way as we could on ichis.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julie Burrows</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:36:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: evince passes security audit</title><link>http://blog.evince-online.com/?p=26#comment-2282013</link><description>Stefan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks very much for clarifying this. I have to point out that this wasn't Giles' mistake, but one I introduced upon proofing which I'm sure I will not hear the end of in the office!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OL has worked with NCC to hold the iChIS source code over the past few years, and are very happy with the service which is why we've worked with them to provide this facility for evince. Howvere, as both comments have pointed out, should a customer require an alternative provider of escrow services we are happy to meet this requirement and you should make sure you're totally happy with any service offered before ticking the escrow box in your procurement.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ennui2342</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:01:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: evince passes security audit</title><link>http://blog.evince-online.com/?p=26#comment-2282012</link><description>Overlooking escrow services in the procurement &lt;br&gt;process can be risky now that business continuity and &lt;br&gt;sustainability are high on the agenda. For the last 20 &lt;br&gt;years, there has been no effective specialist ICT &lt;br&gt;escrow provider to compete with NCC Group. &lt;br&gt;However, recent changes have acted as a catalyst: &lt;br&gt;the NCC Group has been transformed from a quasi- &lt;br&gt;government body to a privatised plc, becoming fully &lt;br&gt;listed on the London Stock Exchange in July 2007. &lt;br&gt;Since NCC is now a private company you can no &lt;br&gt;longer mandate for its use and most standard form &lt;br&gt;government contracts are now prescribing “a &lt;br&gt;reputable escrow provider” as opposed to specifying &lt;br&gt;NCC Group. OGC guidance is that NCC Group must &lt;br&gt;now be treated as any other private organisation and &lt;br&gt;as such must not be stipulated in public contracts. So &lt;br&gt;now we have a choice, but in a recent survey 95% of &lt;br&gt;local authorities and software companies were &lt;br&gt;unaware of any escrow providers other than NCC. &lt;br&gt;Where can you go for an alternative? Your software &lt;br&gt;supplier may have an existing multi-user agreement &lt;br&gt;with the NCC and initially may be reluctant to set up a &lt;br&gt;new one, though the same survey found 95% of &lt;br&gt;clients and software companies would be open to &lt;br&gt;using an alternative escrow provider. &lt;br&gt;Some organisations opt for using a bank, but this &lt;br&gt;rarely provides more than a vault service. Checks that &lt;br&gt;the media are readable and material is complete are &lt;br&gt;essential if the escrow is to have any real value. &lt;br&gt;We have identified several possible alternative &lt;br&gt;suppliers. As you would expect in a market which &lt;br&gt;was effectively a monopoly until very recently, new &lt;br&gt;entrants are competing both on price and on service. &lt;br&gt;One alternative supplier, for example, offers an online &lt;br&gt;management system and claims it has a strong &lt;br&gt;following in local government because of its ability to &lt;br&gt;cover key local government software applications. &lt;br&gt;In the context of on-going financial pressures it is &lt;br&gt;worth re-considering existing escrow arrangements &lt;br&gt;too. One alternative supplier claims that an authority &lt;br&gt;holding five to ten software applications in escrow &lt;br&gt;could save around £3,000 without risk of detriment to &lt;br&gt;service levels. It is also important to check that any &lt;br&gt;escrow provider has sufficient professional indemnity &lt;br&gt;cover, just in case.  &lt;br&gt;For more information on how Socitm Consulting &lt;br&gt;can help you in this area, please email us at &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="mailto:consulting@socitm.gov.uk" rel="nofollow"&gt;consulting@socitm.gov.uk&lt;/a&gt; or call 0845 450 0904. &lt;br&gt;Escrow Services - choice is now compulsory</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ps source</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 03:56:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: evince passes security audit</title><link>http://blog.evince-online.com/?p=26#comment-2282011</link><description>I would like to point out the fact that no source code will be held with "National Computing Centre" and we are a little unhappy/concerned that you do not seem to be aware or know who you are storing your source code with.  The escrow company you refer to has not been part of our organisation for nearly 10 years and can no longer be mandated for as they have no connection to central or local government.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stefan Foster</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 03:44:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Overview of the ISPP</title><link>http://blog.evince-online.com/?p=10#comment-2280716</link><description>Thanks again Mark.  ISPP workshops helped by this.&lt;br&gt;If you need me, the IISAM office at Birmingham City Council is on 0121 464 3074.&lt;br&gt;Cheers, Paul.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Mohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 10:48:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Overview of the ISPP</title><link>http://blog.evince-online.com/?p=10#comment-2280714</link><description>Thanks Mark,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;we will be going along to the regional workshops and this is VERY useful background info.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:0)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Mohr</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 06:16:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Section 12 guidance hits the streets</title><link>http://blog.evince-online.com/?p=5#comment-2279913</link><description>With a widened and more integrated agenda, it is true that there is increasing overlap with heavy-hitters who are specialists in other areas such as education. However, we still feel strongly that to fully meet the requirements of the information duty, local authorities need to look to specialist suppliers who can deliver both the understanding and capability to support CIS' in the implementation of the Childcare Act. A smaller, faster company can often deliver more innovation and greater customer focus, than a larger supplier, and in a fast-moving policy landscape this should be a key concern in choosing your partners.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We would expect that our track record of delivering the iChIS system and the CCL infrastructure at both a local and national level for many years, bears out our capability and professionalism as an IT supplier. We have been underpinning over 100 CIS' with IT infrastructure through the CCL contract and we will be maintaining the same levels of service to local authorities going forwards with evince.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ennui2342</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:53:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Section 12 guidance hits the streets</title><link>http://blog.evince-online.com/?p=5#comment-2279912</link><description>Not sure if Opportunity Links really has clout to compete with more professional IT suppliers</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:25:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>